Since we first took our
efforts public, we’ve encountered a number of obstacles. However, there are
some that stand out as attempts to impede or silence us. First there were denials
by the
local DA Dave Clark and Oak Ridge Police
Chief James Akagi of Alex’s participation
as a witness in the prosecution of a check fraud scheme. Hundreds of pages of police
reports and court documents would later reveal that Alex was the primary complainant
who filed the initial police report with Chief Akagi’s department and received
multiple subpoenas to testify in cooperation with DA Clark’s office in their prosecution
of the individuals in question.
Then, there was a mystery
audit that surfaced three years after Alex died. Though
DA Clark said it cameback “clean,” (see Clark's exact words halfway down page 3) others (including CockeCounty officials) insinuated that Alex
was guilty of something. Our requests for supporting documentation, including thisone from our attorney, have been ignored by Alex’s
former employer. If he did something wrong, they should prove it. Otherwise,
they’ve denigrated a dead man who cannot defend himself and leave us with no
choice but to question their motives.
And most recently, in an
apparent response to our
television interview, a digital file alleged
suicide note and other documents
have surfaced. Three and a half years after Alex’s death, his
widow presented an electronic file to Chief Akagi which she claimed was a
suicide note. Neither Akagi nor DA Clark authenticated the file before releasing
it to the press. Instead, both men along with Cocke County officials, held it up
as if it were proof that Alex committed suicide. We had to hire a forensic
analyst who determined that the
note had been altered multiple times after Alex’s death and concluded that attribution
of authorship to our son was fallacious.
We then urged Akagi and
Clark to conduct an official analysis of the file and we offered to pay to have
the computer forensically analyzed at no cost to the widow. She declined our
offer and both Clark and Akagi have refused to take the steps necessary to
legitimize the note.
When we were first
informed of a note in late 2013, we were denied access to it. We were told that
it was found “buried under a ton of files that Alex had opened up on the
laptop. It appeared he did not want me to find it.” This claim seems like a
physical contradiction.
We also don’t think the
content of the note reads like something Alex would write, it contains no
signature or closing and some of the phrasing sounds contrived, i.e., “I was
just depressed and nothing I did helped cure this feeling.” However, it does
specifically address us, his parents and other family members. If Alex did
write it, then such a personal communication should have been released in full
to the addressees first. It is
heartbreaking to have seen it released so carelessly to the press when it was
withheld for years from those whom it was intended.
Finally, there have been
contradicting statements made by those who found the note regarding when and
where they found it. Statements have been documented that it was discovered
just a few weeks after Alex’s death as well as the following year after his
death. Ironically, had this note been presented to us when it was found and if
it were legitimate, we likely would have never have gone down a path of
questioning our son’s death. Given all of these facts, we cannot accept that
this note was written by our son.
Released with the
alleged suicide note were two receipts for purchases made the morning of Alex’s
death. One of those receipts was for two boxes of ammunition. We now know that Alex
also purchased ammunition the day before. If his intent was suicide, why would he purchase additional ammunition the
morning of his death if he’d just purchased shells that were never used? We
also wonder why someone would take multiple boxes of ammunition when suicide
requires a single bullet. To this day, all of the boxes of ammunition are missing
and have never been returned to us by Cocke County.
A third receipt for a
purchase made with Alex’s credit or debit card the morning of his death has not
resurfaced as of yet. That receipt, found by Alex’s father and brother was for a
diet coke and a cranberry juice. The fact that two shotguns and four boxes of
shells were found at the scene and that there were two drinks purchased that
morning caused our private investigator to question if Alex was alone that morning.
We don’t know, but must consider all possibilities.
We’ve already shared here,
there are numerous reasons we question the suicide ruling. We will not rehash those reasons other than to point out that no
evidence has been produced to substantiate the claim that Alex killed himself. The medical examiner who made the suicide
ruling never physically examined Alex’s body, crime scene photos show no blood
at the scene, and because no ballistics or fingerprints were taken and no shell
casing was retrieved, there is no way to match the bullet to the wound or the
weapon to the bullet that killed Alex.
As
has been shared, Alex was stressed over the uncertainty with his job given
the odd request of his supervisor to come in on the day he was supposed to
leave for vacation. We talked with him at great length the days before his death. During those conversations,
he shared his strategies for taking care of his family should something happen
with his job and we let him know that we would help fill in any financial gaps.
Even though he had concerns, Alex remained focused on his future as a new
father and on his next career moves.
We were exceptionally
close to our son and maintained contact with him several times a week. Though
we were living in different states, we visited with him three different times in
the months preceding his death . We knew our son well. We recognize that as his
parents, our emotional attachment can cloud objectivity. However, the reasons,
and there are many, that we cannot accept his death as a suicide are purely
fact-based. We respect those who chose to believe otherwise; however, that will
not deter us from seeking answers and challenging misinformation. We ask those
who may disagree with us to respect our position as we do yours and we thank
the countless individuals who’ve been so tremendously supportive along the way,
many of whom we’ve never met. God Bless you all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.